California SB 524 (AI Use by Law Enforcement)

Proposed 2025-02-20 | Enacted 2025-10-10 | Official source

Summary

Requires law enforcement agencies to disclose AI usage in reports and retain drafts generated by AI. Obligates agencies to maintain AI usage audit trails. Prohibits vendors from misusing data, except for specified purposes. Defines "artificial intelligence" and related terms.

  • This machine-generated summary is awaiting review by an AGORA editor. Use with caution.

Key facts

🏛️ This document has been enacted by the State of California. For authoritative text and metadata, visit the official source.

📜 This document's name is California SB 524 (Law enforcement agencies: artificial intelligence.). AGORA also tracks this document under the name California SB 524 (AI Use by Law Enforcement).

Themes AI risks, applications, governance strategies, and other themes addressed in AGORA documents.

Thematic tags are in progress.

Full text

  • This is an unofficial copy. The document has been archived and reformatted in plaintext for AGORA. Footnotes, tables, and similar material may be omitted. For the official text, visit the original source.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 13663 is added to the Penal Code, to read: 13663. (a) Each law enforcement agency shall maintain a policy to require an official report prepared by a law enforcement officer or any member of a law enforcement agency that is generated using artificial intelligence either fully or partially to contain both of the following: (1) On each page of the official report, or within the body of the text, identify every specific artificial intelligence program used in a manner that makes such identification readily apparent to the reader and prominently state the following: “This report was written either fully or in part using artificial intelligence.” (2) The signature of the law enforcement officer or member of a law enforcement agency who prepared the official report, either in physical or electronic form, verifying that they reviewed the contents of that report and that the facts contained in the official report are true and correct.
(b) (1) If a law enforcement officer or any member of a law enforcement agency uses artificial intelligence to create an official report, whether fully or partially, the first draft created shall be retained by the agency for as long as the official report is retained. (2) Except for the official report, a draft of any report created with the use of artificial intelligence shall not constitute an officer’s statement. (c) The agency utilizing artificial intelligence to generate a first draft or official report shall maintain an audit trail for as long as the official report is retained that, at a minimum, identifies both of the following: (1) The person who used artificial intelligence to create a report. (2) The video and audio footage used to create a report, if any. (d) (1) A contracted vendor shall not share, sell, or otherwise use information provided by a law enforcement agency to be processed by artificial intelligence except for either of the following purposes: (A) The contracted law enforcement agency’s purposes. (B) Pursuant to a court order. (2) A contracted vendor may access data processed by artificial intelligence for the purposes of troubleshooting, bias mitigation, accuracy improvement, or system refinement.
(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply: (1) “Artificial intelligence” means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments. “Artificial intelligence” as used in this section applies to artificial intelligence systems that automatically draft police report narratives based upon an analysis of in-car or dash-mounted cameras, or body-worn camera audio or video, and artificial intelligence systems that analyze a law enforcement officer’s dictated report to generate a police report narrative automatically enhanced by generative artificial intelligence. (2) “Contracted vendor” means a third party which has made artificial intelligence available to law enforcement for the purpose of generating a draft police report. (3) “First draft” means the initial document or narrative produced solely by artificial intelligence. (4) “Law enforcement agency” means any department or agency of the state or any local government, special district, or other political subdivision thereof, that employs any peace officer, as described in Section 830. (5) “Official report” means the final version of the report that is signed by the officer under paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.