Require parties using generative AI for court documents to disclose its use and name the specific tool. Include examples like ChatGPT, Bing AI, or Google Bard. Ensure compliance with existing filing standards under 12 O.S. §2011.
Require any attorney, pro se defendant, victim, or other party using generative AI in drafting documents for the Municipal Criminal Court to disclose the use of such AI.
Specify the name of the generative AI tool used in the filing.
Include ChatGPT, Bing AI, and Google Bard under the definition of generative AI.
Maintain the applicability of 12 O.S. §2011 to all filings, ensuring compliance is certified by the person signing the document.
This summary is awaiting validation (peer review by a second AGORA editor).
Key facts
🏛️ This document has been enacted by the city of Tulsa, OK.
For authoritative text and metadata, visit the official source.
🎯 This document primarily applies to the government, rather than the private sector.
📜 This document's name is The City of Tulsa Municipal Court Rules 2024.
AGORA also tracks this document under the name The City of Tulsa Municipal Court Rules 2024, Rule 25. "Generative AI". It is part of The City of Tulsa Municipal Court Rules 2024.
↳ This document is part of a longer one: The City of Tulsa Municipal Court Rules 2024.
Some AGORA documents are "split off" from longer documents that mix AI
and non-AI content, such as omnibus authorization or appropriations laws
in the United States Congress. Read more >>
Themes AI risks, applications, governance strategies, and other themes addressed in AGORA documents.
Thematic tags for this document are awaiting validation (peer review by a second AGORA editor).
This is an unofficial copy. The document has been
archived and reformatted in plaintext for AGORA. Footnotes, tables, and
similar material may be omitted. For the official text, visit the original source.
Thematic tags for this document are awaiting validation (peer review by a second AGORA editor).
Any attorney, pro se defendant, victim or other party using a generative AI tool in the preparation or drafting of a document filed with the Municipal Criminal Court must disclose in that filing that generative AI was used. Additionally, the name of the specific generative AI tool that was used must be stated. Generative AI shall include, but shall not be limited to, ChatGPT, Bing AI, or Google Bard. All filers should note that 12 O.S. §2011 continues to apply to all filings presented to the Municipal Criminal Court. Accordingly, the Municipal Criminal Court will continue to construe all such filings, as certified by the person signing the filed document, to be in compliance with 12 O.S. §2011(B)(2).
Requires disclosure of generative AI use and tool name in Municipal Criminal Court document filings.
Requires disclosure of generative AI use and tool name in Municipal Criminal Court document filings.